Lecanemab: "Seismic" changes to clinical trials & MCI options?

Insights and discussion from the cutting edge with reference to journal articles and other research papers.
Post Reply
NF52
Support Team
Support Team
Posts: 2801
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2016 9:41 am
Location: Eastern U.S.

Lecanemab: "Seismic" changes to clinical trials & MCI options?

Post by NF52 »

Like it or loathe it, lecanemab may be changing the discussion around approvals for use of "disease-modifying treatments" in people diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia who also have blood tests or PET scans showing elevated amyloid beta in their brains.

With detailed results scheduled to be presented on Nov 29 at the CTAD (Clinical Trials on Alzheimer's Disease) conference, it's likely we will be seeing news articles about the implications discussed below in a 3-minute read from AlzForum on Oct 7: How Will Alzheimer’s Trials, Treatment Change in 2023 and Beyond?

Here are some highlights from the article:
When Eisai and Biogen announced positive top-line results for their anti-amyloid antibody lecanemab, the trial became the first successful, completed Phase 3 Alzheimer's drug study in the Western world in more than 20 years. If lecanemab earns traditional approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration based on these results, as is widely expected, the effects could be seismic. For the first time, patients could get a prescription for a disease-modifying treatment along with their Alzheimer’s diagnosis....

Eisai/Biogen reported that lecanemab slowed clinical decline on the CDR-SB, ADAS-Cog14, ADCOMS, and ADCS MCI Activities of Daily Living with robust statistical significance, though the numerical advantage on the CDR-SB was small, amounting to a difference of 0.45 over 18 months [Note: See below for CDR items]. The companies have said they will apply for traditional approval in the U.S., Europe, and Japan, though they have already submitted for accelerated approval in the U.S., with a decision expected by January 6 (May 2022 news; Jul 2022 news). This means lecanemab could be on the U.S. market within three months....

The findings raise a slew of new questions. Chief among them is whether the data will move the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to...[enable] widespread use. Other clinical questions include whether updated Appropriate Use Recommendations are needed, whether lecanemab treatment can be stopped at some point, and how to identify people who respond best...The worldwide Clarity trial posted overall racial and ethnic diversity of 33 percent. Among U.S. participants, 25 percent came from minority groups, reflecting the makeup of the Medicare population...the companies reported...

Researchers Alzforum spoke to were encouraged by Clarity’s top-line results suggesting less ARIA than was seen with aducanumab. Overall, 12 percent more people developed ARIA on lecanemab than on placebo. This took the form of either brain edema alone, or edema with microhemorrhages. AD researchers are anxious to see the data on how ARIA risk varies with APOE genotype. In the Phase 2 lecanemab trial, Eisai reported that the heightened risk clustered in APOE4 homozygotes, with heterozygotes having the same odds as APOE3 carriers (Aug 2022 news). If that holds in Phase 3, it might lead clinicians to use the treatment for a broader range of patients....

Eisai/Biogen are developing a subcutaneous [skin injection] formulation that could be administered at home... The subcutaneous formulation also caused less ARIA-E, due to slower absorption that kept the maximum plasma concentration at one-fourth that of intravenous lecanemab. It is unclear how quickly this formulation could be approved and brought to market...

Researchers...[note] that the availability of lecanemab would facilitate testing of concurrent therapies where each drug hits different aspects of the disease. In the case of other anti-amyloid treatments, trials could test whether they were equivalent to lecanemab in efficacy, while perhaps having advantages in cost, safety, or ease of use,

The Clarity trial enrolled people with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia, hence lecanemab would be approved only for symptomatic AD. Lecanemab is being tested in a prevention paradigm in the AHEAD 3-45 study of cognitively healthy people with amyloid plaque deposition; that four-year study is recruiting and won't read out any time soon.

Even critics of the amyloid hypothesis told Alzforum they would prescribe lecanemab, or even consider getting a PET scan themselves and trying to get access to the drug in an N-of-1 personal prevention mode. All researchers contacted for this story agree more effective treatments are needed to halt or, better yet, reverse cognitive decline. Most think this will require concurrent therapies that target multiple pathologies. Reiman likened amyloid to a smoldering kindling that lights the fire of neurodegeneration, which then becomes self-sustaining. The fire may take the form of inflammation or aggregated tau, or both.
For those wondering how much of a difference 0.45 on the CDR-SB really is, here's a PDF showing a description of scores of 0 (Unimpaired); 0.5 (evidence of MCI); 1.0 (evidence of mild dementia); 2.0 (evidence of moderate dementia).
Clinical Dementia Rating: Sum of Boxes test items

People on lecanemab who stayed at 0.5 (MCI) instead of moving to 0.95 [if 0.5+0.47= average placebo progression with MCI in 18 months] appear to have avoided progression to a diagnosis of dementia for at least a while, and those with mild dementia avoided moving halfway to moderate dementia.
4/4 and still an optimist!
User avatar
TheresaB
Mod
Mod
Posts: 1613
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2016 9:46 am
Location: Front Range, CO

Re: Lecanemab: "Seismic" changes to clinical trials & MCI options?

Post by TheresaB »

I hope lecanemab does prove to be a helpful treatment, but all is not roses, there are many issues to consider.

Lecanemab is a monoclonal antibody that depends on validity of the amyloid hypothesis. Numerous previous anti-amyloid drugs have failed. The amyloid hypothesis has been in question for years and such questions only grew recently when it was revealed that one of the most cited Alzheimer’s studies that underpins a key element of the amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s Disease cited fraudulent/manipulated “evidence”. {Source published by Science: BLOTS ON A FIELD? Potential fabrication in research images threatens key theory of Alzheimer’s disease }

According to this article recently published by Nature on 29 September 2022, Alzheimer’s drug slows mental decline in trial — but is it a breakthrough?
Some researchers are celebrating this week’s announcement that a drug candidate for Alzheimer’s disease slowed the rate of cognitive decline for people in a clinical trial by 27%. Others, however, remain hesitant, wanting to see data beyond what was disclosed in a 27 September Press release.
Also from the Nature article:
“I don’t think one study will prove a very long-standing controversial hypothesis,” says Brent Forester, director of the Geriatric Psychiatry Research Program at McLean Hospital in Belmont, Massachusetts, who helped to run the clinical trial for lecanemab. “But one positive study supports the hypothesis.”

Of note on lecanemab:
1) It does not improve cognition and does not stabilize Alzheimer’s. It simply slows decline in the early stages.
2) Its slowing of decline was in between that of aducanumab (22% slowing in its best trial, none in another trial) and donanemab (32% slowing).
3) Side effects include brain microhemorrhage and brain edema. Thus some people get worse instead of slowing their decline.
{Source: Dale Bredesen, MD}

Also, (if you follow the ApoE4.info Facebook page) we recently posted an article citing an interesting spin on the amyloid theory, Decreased proteins, not amyloid plaques, tied to Alzheimer's disease that a new theory proposes that Alzheimer's disease is caused by a DECLINE in levels of the protein amyloid-beta, not an increase as proposed by the amyloid hypothesis. After all, many of us accumulate amyloid plaque in our brains and don’t develop dementia.

Here is the full paper published in the Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease that the ScienceDaily article is referring to: High Soluble Amyloid-β42 Predicts Normal Cognition in Amyloid-Positive Individuals with Alzheimer’s Disease-Causing Mutations .
-Theresa
ApoE 4/4
NF52
Support Team
Support Team
Posts: 2801
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2016 9:41 am
Location: Eastern U.S.

Re: Lecanemab: "Seismic" changes to clinical trials & MCI options?

Post by NF52 »

TheresaB wrote: Tue Oct 11, 2022 7:57 am “I don’t think one study will prove a very long-standing controversial hypothesis,” says Brent Forester, director of the Geriatric Psychiatry Research Program at McLean Hospital in Belmont, Massachusetts, who helped to run the clinical trial for lecanemab. “But one positive study supports the hypothesis.”

Of note on lecanemab:
1) It does not improve cognition and does not stabilize Alzheimer’s. It simply slows decline in the early stages.
2) Its slowing of decline was in between that of aducanumab (22% slowing in its best trial, none in another trial) and donanemab (32% slowing).
3) Side effects include brain microhemorrhage and brain edema. Thus some people get worse instead of slowing their decline.
{Source: Dale Bredesen, MD}

Also, (if you follow the ApoE4.info Facebook page) we recently posted an article citing an interesting spin on the amyloid theory, Decreased proteins, not amyloid plaques, tied to Alzheimer's disease that a new theory proposes that Alzheimer's disease is caused by a DECLINE in levels of the protein amyloid-beta, not an increase as proposed by the amyloid hypothesis. After all, many of us accumulate amyloid plaque in our brains and don’t develop dementia.

Here is the full paper published in the Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease that the ScienceDaily article is referring to: High Soluble Amyloid-β42 Predicts Normal Cognition in Amyloid-Positive Individuals with Alzheimer’s Disease-Causing Mutations .
Thanks for your thoughtful response, Theresa.

You've made some important points.
For example, Dr. Forester's comment makes sense: One positive study will never "prove" a controversial hypothesis; but as he said, it does "support the hypothesis." Science is a process of testing and refining hypotheses, and AD research is surely part of that process.

And it is true that people with amyloid beta die from other causes; yet since the accumulation of amyloid beta oligomers and plaques can take 20 years before tau tangles and neuron loss develop, it seems likely that ApoE 4/4s who accumulate A-beta earlier have a longer lifespan to reach that 20 year threshold than someone with ApoE 3/3 or some of those great resilient genes you've posted about on FB!

I do follow the FB page, and am also "addicted" to Google Scholar ApoE 4 searches, JAMA Neurology, MedPage today and AlzForum's weekly newsletter. I had read that article and think it's intriguing. The DIAN [Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer's Network] study referenced in the article was of 340 people at a "mean age" of 38, who sadly carry one of several dominantly inherited mutations (APP, PSEN1, PSEN2, the Jalisco variant) that make them destined to develop dementia in their 30's, 40's or 50's. I was able to meet one of these incredible participants 2 years ago; he's dedicated himself to participating in DIAN trials in hopes for a better future for his young daughter.

The results they found deserve extensive research to see what prevented those AB42 monomers from changing into oligomers, in the same way that colon and breast cancer research should focus on what prevents some polyps or "indolent" tumors from ever becoming malignant. Maybe metabolism or insulin sensitivity drives preserved high AB42 and cognition, from this sentence:
Higher CSF A􏰀42 levels were also associated with larger hippocampi volume and higher FDG-PET uptake at baseline
But that leaves the question of what to do when monomers do turn toxic?

BTW, I have no quarrel with calling Dr. Lesne's fraud, but no PET scan or CSF or blood test measures Aβ56 the "species" he claimed to have captured, and no drug targets it. He's a disgrace; but he's not a leader in the field, no matter how many times he was sloppily cited, from what I've heard at the AAIC and on AlzForum.

What's interesting to me is that lecanemab developers AGREE that soluble Ab42 monomers should NOT be the target for their treatment, with 1000x the targeting power for oligomers over soluble Ab42 monomers!
Amyloid β protein (Aβ) exists in various conformational states, including soluble monomers, soluble aggregates of increasing size (e.g., oligomers, protofibrils), and insoluble fibrils and plaque. Soluble Aβ aggregates have been shown to be more toxic than monomers or insoluble fibrils, and we hypothesized that reducing these soluble Aβ aggregates could represent an effective treatment approach in early stages of AD.
Lecanemab (BAN2401)... binds to soluble Aβ aggregates (oligomers and protofibrils) with high selectivity over monomer (> 1000-fold) and insoluble fibrils (approximately 10–15 fold)
A randomized, double-blind, phase 2b proof-of-concept clinical trial in early Alzheimer’s disease with lecanemab, an anti-Aβ protofibril antibody

In fact, the DIAN Network approved and is currently recruiting for a study of lecanemab in DIAN participants combined with an anti-tau drug against lecanemab without the anti-tau drug. Here's a statement from Washington University on that:
Eisai and the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network Trials Unit (DIAN-TU) at Washington University in St. Louis have previously announced a collaboration to include lecanemab in the DIAN-TU NexGen trial to be tested with E2814 – an experimental immunotherapy targeting the microtubule binding domain of the tau protein... principal investigator Randall J. Bateman, MD, the Charles F. and Joanne Knight Distinguished Professor of Neurology and the director of DIAN-TU [said] “In our symptomatic and secondary prevention trials in dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s disease, all participants will receive lecanemab and in combination will be randomized to receive an anti-tau drug (E2814) or placebo. We have scientific rationale that targeting both amyloid and tau could provide an even greater benefit than either alone.”Because the Clarity AD trial was conducted in a non-dominantly inherited form of AD, it is possible that treatment benefits from lecanemab may be different in dominantly inherited AD (DIAD)...Safety data will continue to be monitored by the DIAN-TU Data Safety Monitoring Board. The DIAN-TU NexGen trial of E2814 and lecanemab is currently recruiting participants [Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05269394].
I think that people who face a certainty of early dementia, as the DIAN participants do, may view the risk/benefit calculations differently than others of us. In any case, I think sharing info is always helpful, so appreciate that you did so--and do every day on FB!
Nancy
4/4 and still an optimist!
Greyhound
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 81
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2022 3:31 pm
Location: north america

Re: Lecanemab: "Seismic" changes to clinical trials & MCI options?

Post by Greyhound »

Sorry I just do not like brain bleeds.

Only APOE4 Carriers Benefit From Lecanemab For Alzheimer's Disease

The reviewer is a well respected scientist.

https://seekingalpha.com/article/454462 ... rs-disease
Post Reply